Afrates v. City of Lorain
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The question we are asked to decide is whether the commission’s May 5, 1988 decision, finding that the city did not receive, as required by R.C. 4123.522, notice of the administrator’s April 1987 order, is appealable under the provisions of R.C. 4123.519. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the May 5, 1988 decision of the commission was not appealable pursuant to the terms of R.C. 4123.519 and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
In part, R.C. 4123.519 (now renumbered 4123.519[A]) provided:
“The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Reeves v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Seabloom Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.