Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rhodes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 2007No. A04-2252PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This lawyer discipline action .arose out of a petition served and filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility alleging that Bradley C. Rhodes violated the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct by: failing to abide by client decisions concerning the objectives of the representation (Rule 1.2); failing to act diligently in client matters (Rule 1.3); failing to reasonably communicate with clients (Rule 1.4); acquiring an interest in client property without the client’s informed consent (Rule 1.8(a)); failing to hold client funds in trust (Rule 1.15(a));…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API