Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Aitken
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 2010No. A09-1066PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition seeking disciplinary action against respondent Robert H. Aitken, III, alleging that Aitken violated Rules 3.4(a) (alteration of document), 4.1 (truthfulness), 8.1(b) (noncooperation), 8.4(c) (dishonesty) and (d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC), and Rule 25 of the Minnesota Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), for forgery, knowingly making a false statement of fact to a tribunal in the course of…
3Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against VarrianoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by40 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrigsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.