Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 2007No. A06-1370PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This attorney disciplinary action arose out of a petition filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility alleging that attorney Dewey M. Nelson committed misconduct that violated Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct for: failing to act diligently (Rule 1.3); failing to place client funds in a trust account (Rule 1.15(a) as interpreted by Board Opinion 15 1 ); failing to refund to the client the unearned portion of client funds (Rule 1.15(c)(4)); failing to protect the client’s interest at the termination of representation (Rule 1.16(d)); failing to…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by76 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API