Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against De Rycke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 2006No. A04-417PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In March 2004, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Eric De Rycke. Because De Rycke failed to respond, the allegations are deemed admitted. The only issue is the appropriate discipline for an attorney who, after having been disciplined three times for similar misconduct, misappropriated client funds, neglected his clients, mismanaged his client trust account, violated a court order, and failed to cooperate with the Director’s investigation of these matters. We conclude that the facts and…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by31 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.