In Re Disciplinary Action Against Brooks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This attorney discipline action arose from a petition 'filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility alleging that respondent Jane E. Brooks violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct (MRPC) 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(a), 1.16(d), 8.1(a)(3), and 8.4(c)-(d); Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR); and Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Opinion "Nos. 9 and 12. Because Brooks has failed to respond to the petition or to cooperate with the investigation despite the Director’s repeated efforts, we granted the Director’s motion, under Rule 13(b), RLPR, that…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by39 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.