Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Garcia
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 2010No. A09-877PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This discipline case involving respondent attorney Albert A. Garcia, Jr., arises out of an amended petition for revocation of probation and for further disciplinary action filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility. We suspended Garcia from the practice of law on September 3, 2009, pending final determination of discipline. A court-appointed referee heard evidence for and against the petition, concluded Garcia engaged in misconduct, and recommended that he be disbarred. Based on the referee’s findings and our own review of the record, we conclude that…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NathansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.