Legal Opinion
Ebner Gold Mining Co. v. Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1914No. 2155PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The decision of the case turns upon the validity of the location of the Parish No. 2 and the Oregon lode claims. Involved in this question is the necessity for determining whether. or not there was any substantial evidence introduced upon which the court was justified in predicating its view of lack of discovery on the Parish No. 2. The contention of the'Ebner Company is that the record discloses that upon the trial, “by a great preponderance of the evidence, if not by the undisputed proof, plaintiff in error or its grantors had, prior to any intervening…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phipps v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Sierra Union Water & Mining Co. v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McIntosh v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Grant v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- North American Dredging Co. v. MintzerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947
- Lowe v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Ebner Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Ames v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916