Legal Opinion
Moore v. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1903No. 802PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
A motion is made to dismiss the appeal upon the ground, first, that no assignment of errors was filed in the court below; and, second, that the paper which appears in the record as an assignment of errors does not comply with the requirements of rule 11 of this court. An assignment of errors is found in the record, but there is no indorsement of a file mark thereon by the clerk. It begins with the recital, however, that the appellant “presents this assignment of- errors together with his petition for appeal.” The last paragraph of the petition for appeal recites that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Mutual Life Insurance v. PhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- North American Exploration Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Tate v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Merritt Oil Corp. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Ebner Gold Mining Co. v. Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Willamette & Columbia River Towing Co. v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Copper River Mining Co. v. McClellanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1903
- Thompson v. BurkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.