Legal Opinion

United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. Lowe

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 18, 1947No. Nos. 5493, 5494PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

This is a suit to quiet title in support of an adverse filed in the Land Office against defendant Lowe’s application for patents.

The plaintiffs allege ownership of the “L Association” and “Snow Shoe Fraction”, placer mining claims', by virtue of locations thereof in 1908. The defendant claims the ground in controversy by locations made in 1941, upon the theory (a) that the location certificates of plaintiffs’ predecessors were insufficient; and (b) that the annual labor was not done .as required by law.

The case was in the nature of a suit in equity, triable before the…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Bethesda Sheet Metal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. LumAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lowe v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Morgan v. SorensonUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. LumAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API