Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1887PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Douglas County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This is an action of replevin. The property sought to be recovered is fifty-five thousand feet of lumber piled in the mill and mill-yard at Gurney’s Mill,, in Douglas County, Oregon. The lumber was distributed in from twelve to fifteen separate piles, and each lot is particularly described in the complaint, and the entire quantity is alleged to be of the value of five hundred dollars. The defendants allege in their answer, after denying the taking as wrongful, and denying each of the other allegations specifically, that G. A. Taylor at said time was sheriff of Douglas County, Oregon, and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hart v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Alwood v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Parsons v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  4. Fitzhugh v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Guille v. Wong FookOregon Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCargar v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dixon Et Ux v. Schoonover Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nunn v. BirdOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Betz Construction, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Freed Furniture & Carpet Co. v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API