Lowe v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated cases in which appellees sought and obtained judgment quieting their title to two placer *426raining claims situate in the Territory of Alaska. 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. The claims had been located by appellees’ predecessors in interest in 1908. In 1941 appellant made placer locations overlapping all or the major portion of the ground covered by the earlier locations, and subsequently she instituted in the United States Land Office proceedings to obtain patent. Appellees filed adverse claims in the proceeding and supported them with these suits.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Quigley v. GillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Heinze v. Butte & B. Consol. Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947
- Ebner Gold Mining Co. v. Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Kile v. BelisleAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Dodge v. WilkinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- George v. LyonsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953