Sierra Union Water & Mining Co. v. Wolff
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment and correct the conclusion of law and from an order striking out a cost-bill. Stanley A. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
In this case plaintiffs filed a memorandum of costs for $117.15. The court granted defendants’ motion to strike it out and ‘ ‘ disallowed all costs herein to plaintiffs. ’ ’ Plaintiffs appeal from the order. There is an appeal also from the judgment and from the order denying plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the judgment and correct the conclusions of law therein on various grounds, and among others that the findings of fact required that plaintiffs should have a judgment for their costs. The only questions presented in the briefs relate to the order disallowing plaintiffs’ costs.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Fairbanks v. LampkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Michell v. OlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Bond v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Petitpierre v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Gibson v. HammangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.