Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Price
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1903No. 856PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
This is an action of ejectment brought by the defendants in error to recover the possession of a strip of mining ground 18 feet wide at one end, 29 feet at the other, and 1,061 feet long. This land was located as a placer mining claim on August 27, 1900, by E. G. Gould, the grantor of the plaintiffs in error, and was again located on October 26, 1901, by Gould and his grantees. The defendants in error asserted the right to possess said strip by virtue of a location made on May 29, 1899, by Thorulf Kjelsberg, of a placer claim purporting to be, both by the notice of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atherton v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Richmond Mining Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Eilers v. BoatmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rooney v. BarnetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Biglow v. ConradtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Jones v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Zimmerman v. FunchionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Ebner Gold Mining Co. v. Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.