Legal Opinion

Ames v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1916No. 2682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

In an action of ejectment the plaintiff alleged that he was the owner of mining claim No. 32 above Allen’s Discovery on Kougarok river, Alaska, by virtue of a location made in January, 1902, and that in February, 1912, the defendant wrongfully ousted him. The defendant alleged that he was in the possession of a mining claim known as the Kshunti Fraction, which had been lo-' cated on July 25, 1903, and that, if the plaintiff’s mining claim overlaps the said Kshunti Fraction in whole or in part, the overlap is junior in time and inferior in right to the defendant’s title,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Cceur d'Alene Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. Mills v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ebner Gold Mining Co. v. Alaska-Juneau Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. Ouachita Nat. Bank of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API