Legal Opinion
Weil v. Dann
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 10, 1974No. Special Patent Docket No. 184PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Patents *563to reverse the decision of the examiner denying Weil’s motion to shift the burden of proof in interference No. 97,772, which on petition the Commissioner refused to disturb. The adverse party in interference, Fritz et al., joined the Commissioner’s opposition to the petition here and filed a motion for summary denial thereof.
Petitioner alleges an erroneous application of the law in the decision of the examiner. On authority of In re Schmidt, 48 CCPA 1140, 293 F.2d 274 (1961), the examiner accorded Fritz et al. the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gulf Research & Development Co. v. Harrison, District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Application of Maximilian Paul SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weil v. FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Cook v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Formica Corp. v. LefkowitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Reddy v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.