Legal Opinion
Godtfredsen v. Banner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 24, 1979No. Appeal No. 79-514PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Petitioner seeks writs of mandamus and prohibition directing the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to:(1) substitute Count A (reciting a Markush group of compounds) as set forth in Petitioner’s “Motion to Amend By Substituting A New Count for the Present Count,” filed December 7, 1976, as the sole count in interference; and(2) prohibit the interference from proceeding as currently constituted with counts 1, 2 and 3.
The Petition is dismissed.
Background
Interference 99,384 was declared on July 7, 1976, between Godtfredsen application Serial No. 554,423, filed March 3, 1975,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McClung v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Nitz v. EhrenreichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Baker Perkins, Inc., Appellant-Petitioner v. Werner & Pfleiderer Corporation, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Margolis v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Refractarios Monterrey, S.A. v. Ferro Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Hester v. AllgeierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.