Legal Opinion
Reddy v. Dann
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 12, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 76-595PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This petition for a writ of mandamus under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), requests us to vacate the October 6, 1975, decision by the Chairman of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences,1 reported at 187 USPQ 386 (Com’r Pats. 1975), which denied Reddy’s petition from a decision of the Patent Interference Examiner denying Reddy’s motion to restrict Davis et al. (Davis), senior party in interference No. 98,661, to his effective filing date under 37 CFR 1.223(a). We deny the petition.
Preliminarily, the Commissioner argues that we lack subject matter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Weil v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Cook v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Margolis v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Meitzner v. MindickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Almirall, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Fraige v. ParkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979