Legal Opinion

Application of Maximilian Paul Schmidt

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 16, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6690PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant has appealed from the affirmance by the Patent Office Board of Appeals of the rejection of claims 1, 3, 11, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 33, 40, 41, 44, 51, 52, 62, 63, 66, 73 and 74, of appellant’s application Serial No. 718,453, filed March 3, 1958, entitled “Process of Making Printing Plates and Light Sensitive Material Suitable for Use Therein.”

The claims on appeal relate to three classes of subject matter. 1) Claims 1, 3, 11, 40, 41, 44, 51 and 52 relate to novel compositions of matter, 2) claims 12, 14, 22, 62, 63, 66, 73 and 74 relate to presensitized printing plates and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Application of John R. WillinghamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. In re RobertsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  3. Application of Bo Thuresson Af EkenstamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Application of ShackellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Application of StrainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  3. James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Merry Manufacturing Company v. Burns Tool Company and Economy Auto Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. In re HerschlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API