Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
The question for decision is whether the Circuit Court of Appeals below rightly issued its writ of mandamus to the district court to correct that court’s alleged error in striking respondent’s pleas in abatement to a criminal indictment.
An indictment returned in June, 1941, by the grand jury sitting in the district court for Southern California, charged respondents and others with conspiracy to fix the price of evaporated milk sold in interstate commerce in violation of §§ 1 and 3 of the Sherman Act, 15 U. S. C. § § 1,3. The indictment recited that the grand jury which returned it had been…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by924 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
919 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.