Legal Opinion
Cook v. Dann
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 3, 1975No. Special Patent No. 187PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Petitioner Cook seeks a writ of mandamus, directing vacation of a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences which limited the scope of permissible discovery, and a writ of prohibition against continuation of interference No. 98,254. Respondents are the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, the Board of Patent Interferences, and Hayes, Cook’s interference adversary. Hayes has filed a motion to dismiss the petition.
The Patent Trademark Office (PTO) respondents’ challenge to our jurisdiction under the All Writs Act (28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)) must be rejected. Weil v. Dann, 503 F.2d 562…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Weil v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Schenley Industries, Inc. v. E. Martinoni Company, Joseph S. Finch and Company v. E. Martinoni CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
4Cited by7 opinions
- Goodbar v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Wiesner v. WeigertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Cochran v. KresockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Reddy v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.