Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. Allen
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
The matter here before us is related to an appeal by Loshbough from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Allen in Interference No. 93,427 involving counts 1 through 5. It is not the merits of that appeal which we consider at this time but, instead, a Petition for Writ of Mandamus brought by Loshbough. The request for relief is couched in the following terms:
Richard C. Loshbough, appellant before this Court, hereby petitions that this Honorable Court issue a Writ of Mandamus to the Honorable Commissioner of Patents requiring that the Commissioner…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of KyridesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Margolis v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Goodbar v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Weil v. DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.