Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Van Blaricom
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1992No. C6-91-1326PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Dale Van Blaricom challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment for respondents, arguing that genuine issues of material fact exist. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Susan Johnson gave birth to T.D.J. on February 8, 1988. In March of 1988, Johnson and co-respondent Ramsey County initiated a paternity action against appellant. Respondents served appellant with a complaint and a motion to require blood testing.
Respondents eventually made a motion for summary judgment. In support of their motion, they submitted Susan Johnson’s affidavit, the affidavit of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Borom v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Carlisle Ex Rel. Scott v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Fownes v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Williams v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Howie v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Limberg v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Mark Sharockman v. LifeSpan of Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016