Legal Opinion
Carlisle Ex Rel. Scott v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1989No. C1-88-1997PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the granting of partial summary judgment in favor of respondents City of Minneapolis, et al. Appellant Patricia Carlisle, as trustee for the heirs and next-of-kin of Sal Saran Scott, brought a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The trial court found no just reason to delay Carlisle’s appeal on this issue. See Minn.R.Civ.P. 54.02. The three remaining counts of Carlisle’s complaint alleging common law negligence are still pending in Hennepin County.
Carlisle also appeals two orders in which the trial court denied her request for copies of reports of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Maras v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Lloyd v. in Home Health, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Carlson v. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Goward v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.