Legal Opinion

Betlach v. Wayzata Condominium

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1979No. 48795PublishedCited by 408 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Justice.

This case is before us on appeal from a summary judgment entered in the district court dismissing plaintiff’s suit for specific performance of an alleged contract. We reverse.

The original negotiations between the parties had been initiated by plaintiff, who was interested in establishing a location for his jewelry enterprise. The building which plaintiff found to be most suitable was then owned by Ruth Herrick, who leased the property to Polly Berg, Inc. During conversation with Polly Berg, plaintiff learned that defendant Wayzata Condominium had obtained a first right of.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Minar v. SkoogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Hayle Floor Covering, Inc. v. First Minnesota Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. A. E. Staley Mfg. Co. v. Northern Cooperatives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by408 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

403 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API