Legal Opinion

Howie v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1994No. C7-93-1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Mark Thomas challenges a directed verdict in paternity action where a blood test showed a 99.96% probability that he is the father, but he denied ever having had sexual intercourse with the mother.

FACTS

A female child was born to respondent Charlene Howie on June 23, 1983. The mother commenced an action against appellant through the office of the Rice County-Attorney in 1991. After a jury trial, at the close of all the evidence, the trial court granted respondent’s motion for a directed verdict that appellant was the father of the child.

Evidence at trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. PMH PROPERTIES v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, DSS v. James FlanearyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  2. Limberg v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API