Howie v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Mark Thomas challenges a directed verdict in paternity action where a blood test showed a 99.96% probability that he is the father, but he denied ever having had sexual intercourse with the mother.
FACTS
A female child was born to respondent Charlene Howie on June 23, 1983. The mother commenced an action against appellant through the office of the Rice County-Attorney in 1991. After a jury trial, at the close of all the evidence, the trial court granted respondent’s motion for a directed verdict that appellant was the father of the child.
Evidence at trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- PMH PROPERTIES v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth, DSS v. James FlanearyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Limberg v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013