Limberg v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting summary judgment and adjudicating him father of a minor child, arguing that the district court erred by applying the statutory clear and convincing standard as his burden of proof to rebut the presumption of paternity and by failing to consider evidence of other possible fathers not joined in the paternity action. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Brian Bruce Mitchell challenges the district court’s order and judgment adjudicating him father of a minor child born on August 6, 2008. In 2010, the state of Minnesota filed a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Civil Commitment of KroppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- 2700 Hennepin LLC v. VPC Minneapolis Uptown Pizza, LLC, VPC Pizza Operating Corp., ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024