Legal Opinion
Williams v. Curtis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 15, 1993No. C7-93-285PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLTAN, Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment, the alleged father challenges the district court’s determination that he failed to rebut the presumption of paternity under Minn.Stat. § 257.62, subd. 5(b) (1990) with clear and convincing evidence. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Diana Williams gave birth to D.T.W. on November 27, 1990. In April 1992, Williams and co-respondent Pine County instituted a paternity action against appellant Dennis A. Curtis. Curtis answered, denying that the child was conceived by him in February 1990, and denying that he was the father.
Respondents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Nash v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. Van BlaricomCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Itasca County Social Services v. PitzenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyer v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. N.G.T.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Howie v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Limberg v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Meyer v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. N.G.T.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999