Legal Opinion

Borom v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1971No. 42495PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted by the District Court of Ramsey County.

Plaintiffs purport to bring this action as a taxpayers’ class action, alleging that “the defendant, City of Saint Paul, knows or should know that the hiring and recruitment practices of contractors engaged in performance of construction contracts with the City of Saint Paul are, and have in the past, been such that persons of minority race, creed, and color are discriminated against in such recruitment and hiring practices.”

Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief—

“a. restraining the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Ahlm v. RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Rosvall v. ProvostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Adelman v. OnischukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Oehler v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Moundsview Independent School District No. 621 v. Buetow & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API