Legal Opinion

Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1972No. 1569PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court referring a controversy be-sween the City of Anchorage [hereinafter referred to as the City] and the Greater Anchorage Area Borough [hereinafter re*1029ferred to as the Borough] to the Alaska Public Utilities Commission [hereinafter referred to as PUC] for an administrative resolution.

The facts of the instant case are relatively simple. The City had a contract to provide electrical power to the Wagner Estates Subdivision, a real estate development located within the limits of the City. On October 13, 1969, the City…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Cárdenas Maxán v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  2. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fordice v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API