Legal Opinion
Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1980No. 4640, 4641PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER,* BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.
In this appeal, appellants challenge the constitutionality of the investigative demand procedures authorized by the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (AS 45.50.471 et seq.) and the Alaska Restraint of Trade Act (AS 45.52.-200 et seq.).
The facts, insofar as they are material to appellants’ claims, are not in dispute. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. (Arden) and Matanuska Maid, Inc. (Matanuska) are both corporations doing business in the state of Alaska. On May 23, 1978, each was served…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Jacob v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Keyes v. Humana Hospital Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.