Legal Opinion

United States v. Western Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1956No. 18PublishedCited by 1,506 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

The three respondent railroads each sued in the Court of Claims to recover from the United States as shipper the difference between the tariff rates actually paid and those allegedly due on 211 Army shipments of steel aerial bomb cases filled with napalm gel.1 Approximately 200 of the shipments were made over the lines of respondents Bangor and Seaboard in 1944; the remainder were carried by respondent Western Pacific in 1948 and 1950.

Napalm gel is gasoline .which has been thickened by the addition of aluminum soap powder. The mixture is inflammable but not self-igniting. In a completed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,506 opinions

  1. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

1,501 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API