Legal Opinion

Fordice v. Bryan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1995No. 94-CA-00031PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Governor Kirk Fordice of Mississippi appealed from a summary judgment decision in favor of the plaintiff legislators and Attorney General Mike Moore in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County. Governor Fordice argued on appeal that he was properly exercising his partial veto power under Section 73 of the Mississippi Constitution. We disagree and affirm the Chancellor's decision, noting the following:

The most difficult and delicate duty that ever falls to the lot of the court of last resort is ours to-day. In interpreting various provisions of our constitution, we are…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Moore v. MolpusMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Alexander v. State by and Through AllainMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dye v. State Ex Rel. HaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Jubelirer v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. City of Picayune v. Southern Regional Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. Quitman CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sass Muni-V, LLC v. DeSoto County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Barbour v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API