Legal Opinion
Stock v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1974No. 2007PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CONNOR, ERWIN, BOOCHEVER and FITZGERALD, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Justice.
Dave Stock appeals his conviction resulting from the first trial under the Alaska Environmental Conservation Act. 1
Stock contends that:(1) The statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutionally vague;(2) The state failed to comply with AS 46.03.130 by bringing a criminal action before completing administrative proceedings;(3) There was a failure of proof that he was personally liable for pollution caused by the corporation of which he is president;(4) The penalty provisions of AS…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- William B. Melugin v. Lloyd F. Hames, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Gottschalk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.