Legal Opinion

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1962No. 4PublishedCited by 1,925 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren

I

This suit was initiated in November 1955 when the Government filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri alleging that a contemplated merger between the G. R. Kinney Company, Inc. (Kinney), and the Brown Shoe Company, Inc. (Brown), through an exchange of Kinney for Brown stock, would violate § 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U. S. C. § 18. The Act, as amended, provides in pertinent part:

“No corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital ... of another corporation…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,925 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

1,920 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API