Legal Opinion

Mix v. Yoakum

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1934No. Civ. No. 5026PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, J., pro tem.

This action was brought to subject real property alleged to have been fraudulently conveyed by a decedent to defendants, to a claim asserted by appellant against decedent’s estate for money held by decedent during his lifetime, in trust for appellant.

Finis E. Yoakum, Jr., and Charles 0. Yoakum, defendants, are the sons of Finis E. Yoakum, Sr. The father, on August 2, 1920, executed deeds to his two sons, of all real property of which he was then seized, and on the same day executed his last will, in which he named the defendants as executors, and devised and bequeathed his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mix v. YoakumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Carty v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gladwin v. GladwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Saurderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Enos v. Picacho Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Patterson v. MisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Peterson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Burrows v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Wood v. KaplanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API