Legal Opinion

Saurderson v. Broadwell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1889No. 12323PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Rapa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This was a suit to set aside a deed made hy the defendant William B. Broadwell to the defendant C. E. Broadwell, upon the ground that it was in fraud of the rights of plaintiff as a creditor. The trial court gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The court found that the deed “ was in good faith for a valuable consideration; that it was an actual sale, without reservation, and not in trust; fhat said deed was not fraudulently made, and was not made or executed or recorded or received, either on the part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dana v. StanfordsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Gladwin v. GladwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Jamison v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Lawrence v. NeffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Wood v. FranksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dixon Lumber Co. v. PeacockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Carty v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Jarvis v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sabichi v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API