Legal Opinion
Hasenjeager v. Voth
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1928No. Docket No. 3434PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCK (G. F.), J., pro tem.
This is an action by an administrator to set aside a conveyance alleged to have been made by decedent to her daughter, the defendant Helena Voth, with the intent to defraud creditors. The action was brought under the provisions of sections 1589 to 1591 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and was brought to protect the claim of the First National Bank of Bakersfield in the sum of $3,205, which was the only claim filed in the estate. The defendant A. D. Voth was evidently joined in his capacity as husband of the defendant Helena Voth, while the defendant John H. Peters was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Heath v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Carty v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gray v. BrunoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Cook v. CockinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gladwin v. GladwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Enos v. Picacho Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Miller v. KeeganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Reidy v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.