Wood v. Kaplan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
This is an action by a judgment creditor of defendant, Max Kaplan, to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer made by him to his son and daughter-in-law, Sidney and Rose Kaplan, the appellants. The trial court found that the property had been fraudulently transferred and decreed that the appellants held in trust for the respondent $4,992.02 of the proceeds of the subsequent sale of the property. The only argument on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment as there was evidence that the appellants had given fair consideration for the property and in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hickson v. ThielmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Cioli v. KenourgiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Burns v. RadoicichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Taylor v. Osborne-Fitzpatrick Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Decker v. Voisenat (In Re Serrato)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Kirkland v. RissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Chichester v. GoldenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1962
- Elizalde v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Universal Home Improvement v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.