Gladwin v. Gladwin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Twelfth District. For case, see opinion. Defendants were insolvent. The case was tried by the Court; the defendants, Gladwin,rHugg & Co. not answering, the contest was between plaintiff and intervenors. Judgment was entered for plaintiff against defendants, and that the intervenors take nothing by their intervention. Intervenors appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtTerry, C. J.
Field, J. concurring.
Defendants, Gladwin, Hugg & Co. gave to the plaintiff a note to cover the amount of liabilities incurred by plaintiff by indorsements made for the accommodation of Gladwin, Hugg & Co. At the time of executing the note, Gladwin, Hugg & Co. were about to fail, and the note was given for the purpose ot enabling plaintiff to secure himself by attaching property. The *332consideration of the note was the liability incurred by plaintiff as the indorser for defendants, and his express promise to assume and pay such liabilities. The note, which was dated the 17th of May, was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dana v. StanfordsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Cushing v. GoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Ryan v. DalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Carty v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hagenmeyer v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Saurderson v. BroadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.