Legal Opinion
Burrows v. Jorgensen
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 1958No. Civ. 17596PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendants appeal from an order appointing a receiver upon proceedings heard together (1) under a complaint in equity to set aside transfers allegedly in fraud of creditors; (2) under supplementary proceedings in the original case.
Questions Presented
1. Was the appointment of a receiver of the leased apartment houses improper (a) because the transfers of the leases were for consideration, (b) because of the provision providing for cancellation in the event of the appointment of a receiver ?
2. Was the appointment of a receiver to receive future income proper ?
Record
Plaintiffs filed an action…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Gazlay v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bell v. American Protective LeagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security Pacific National Bank v. GeernaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- United States v. John P. Bertie, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Patterson v. MisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Johnson v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- United States v. CrockerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.