Legal Opinion
Enos v. Picacho Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1943No. Civ. 13689PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
The defendant, Nipissing Mining Company, Ltd., appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
The plaintiff, who is a mining engineer, was one of the organizers and first directors of Picacho Gold Mining Company, a corporation organized in 1934 in the State of Ohio, which will be hereinafter referred to as the Ohio company. He was appointed its general manager, and rendered sundry services to it, for which there was due to him on January 28, 1935, the-sum of $7,850; and on that date a note in his favor for the sum stated, due on or before one year from its date, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Joe Balestrieri & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lawless v. Brotherhood of PaintersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.