Alca Construction Co. v. Waterbury Housing Authority
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court denying its application to compel arbitration and to appoint an arbitrator. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that (1) article 31 of the general conditions of the contract between the parties does not constitute an agreement to arbitrate and (2) the terms of a subsequent agreement were part of the contract between the parties and that agreement did not constitute an impermissible modification of the general conditions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The material facts are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gangemi v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Days Inn of America, Inc. v. 161 Hotel Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Kachainy C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Marine Midland Bank v. AhernConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Sosin v. ScintoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.