Legal Opinion
Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 24, 1999No. AC 17688PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiffs, Sebastian Gangemi and Rebecca Gangemi, appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the zoning board of appeals of the town of Fairfield (board)1 on the ground that the court lacked *561subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that the trial court does have subject matter jurisdiction in that the “no rental” condition attached to the variance was personal to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gangemi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Horace v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Pinchbeck v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Gay v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.