Legal Opinion
Loisel v. Rowe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 6, 1995No. 15029PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This case raises significant questions concerning the relationship between federal welfare benefits, the composition of assistance units and the eligibility criteria for the state general assistance program. The plaintiff, Donna Loisel, appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) §§ 17-2b (b) and 4-183 from the administrative denial of her applications for general assistance benefits.1 The trial court reversed the administrative decisions, holding that social security benefits received by the plaintiffs children improperly had been included in calculating the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Micah Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Stamford Hospital v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.