Legal Opinion
Fink v. Golenbock
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 23, 1996No. 15387; 15388PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The plaintiff, Theodore Fink, brought this derivative action suit on behalf of a professional corporation known as Theodore Fink, M.D., and Robert B. Golenbock, M.D., P.C. (corporation) against the defendants, Robert B. Golenbock and Joan A. Magner, claiming that they each had wrongfully converted the assets of the corporation, had tortiously interfered with the reasonable business expectancies of the corporation, had been unjustly enriched, and had violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA).1 Additionally, the plaintiff claimed that Golenbock had violated his fiduciary…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.