Legal Opinion

Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of Manchester

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 17, 1980PublishedCited by 655 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 8-129, on March 14, 1978, the defendant town of Manchester took certain property 1 of the plaintiff, Pandolphe’s Auto Parts, Inc. (hereinafter Pandolphe) by eminent domain and assessed damages at $373,000. Thereafter, Pandolphe, pursuant to General Statutes § 8-132, appealed this award to the Superior Court. The chief court administrator referred the case to three state referees: Hon. Charles 8. House, Hon. Howard W. Alcorn, and Hon. Louis Shapiro, who exercised the powers of the Superior Court. See General Statutes §§ 52-434, 52-434a (b). A trial was held…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Bennett v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Slavitt v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by655 opinions

  1. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

650 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API