Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank v. Ahern
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 16, 1999No. AC 18041PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiff, Marine Midland Bank (bank), to foreclose a judgment lien that it recorded on a condominium owned by the defendants, Patrick Ahem and Maureen Ahem. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) entered an order on January 20, 1998, that rescheduled the law day to occur less than twenty days after the January 5, 1998 order and (2) entered an order on January 5,1998, that, as a condition of the trial court’s granting of the motion to open, improperly required that “Ahern & Partners shall not transfer any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- In re Carissa K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Continental Capital Corp. v. LazarteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Marine Midland Bank v. AhernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.