Legal Opinion

Landauer v. Steelman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for interference with the use of an easement in Grant County. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $1,800 general damages and $3,000 punitive damages. Defendant appeals from the resulting judgment.

Defendant’s primary contention on appeal is that there was not sufficient evidence to prove any substantial interference with the easement or to prove conduct of such a nature as to support an award of punitive damages.

Because of direct conflicts in this testimony it must be kept in mind that after a jury verdict in favor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cronn v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. McGill v. Huling Buick CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sumrell v. Household Finance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. Jim Fisher Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Friendship Auto Sales, Inc. v. Bank of Willamette ValleyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Marsh v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API