Legal Opinion

Watson v. Banducci

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 1999No. 93CV-0701CC CA A97433, 93CV-0994CC CA A98289PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

In a consolidated trial to the court on two actions, 1 the Watsons (plaintiffs) sought damages and injunctions on claims arising from a dispute with the Banduccis (defendants), their neighbors, over an express easement that allows plaintiffs to enter and leave their property over a roadway on defendants’ land. The dispute centers on the interpretation of the easement’s terms. More specifically, the dispute involves whether defendants’ construction of two internal gates, and the locking of one of those gates, violates the easement or, if not violative, whether those acts unreasonably…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Tipperman v. TsiatsosOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Marsh v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. White v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vance v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Knight v. NyaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API